By the time you begin to learn about art styles and movements, it becomes pretty common to be confused about contemporary and modern art. Words like “modern” and “contemporary” are interchangeably used in describing something new or is on trend.

What is Modern and Contemporary?

Modern is often used in describing the recent or present times rather than the remote past. With this in mind, it is a fair assumption that modern art was recently created. But this isn’t the case. Modern art is referring to artworks produced throughout a specific time in the past. Believe it or not, many popular examples of modern art are nearly 200 years old.

When talking about art that is of the present, what we actually mean is contemporary art. Contemporary is the right term to use when describing art of the present time, or frequently, those made by living artists.

Differences between Contemporary and Modern

Contemporary and modern art came from different time periods. The latter is in reference to art that is made from the 1880s all the way to 1970s. Modern art is more recent compared to the classical or Renaissance period. It’s by no means the latest.

With contemporary art on the other hand, it can be described as the present work of art. Normally, those who are still creating arts and alive or those who’ve recently retired or died.

The Focus of each Medium

With modern art, it is mainly on painting or drawing. On the other hand, the rapid increase in technology has significantly changed the available mediums to contemporary artists since the time when the modernist period has ended. In fact, art is not only limited to tangible artwork pieces but you can also see one in form of digital arts, which perhaps can be seen in Minecraft survival servers.

Today, contemporary artists are bolder with their mediums. Just as mentioned, it can be any medium that you can ever think of from object design, video art, graphic arts, tech-enabled/digital artworks and so forth. To some, it can be a challenge to understand and classify contemporary art. Compared to art periods of the past, contemporary art isn’t united by a specific style and can’t be grouped easily to different movements similar to modern art.

The growth of tobacco began nearly 8000 years back though the smoking and chewing of tobacco did not become a widespread phenomenon until about 2000 decades back. The smoking of tobacco became orientated with course with cigars behaving as a status symbol since they were and are still costly, imported, hand-crafted things that political and corporate leaders have made them take the notion of course and the picture of a much better life and standing in society. The setting from the accession of smoking chambers into society and also gentlemen’s clubs created the belief that smoking was rich and privileged. Though this addictive habit has numerous medical implications and throughout the glamorization of smoking through the course and in art across time it has turned into a popular phenomenon, together with societal smoking being a favorite activity, especially amongst youth, regardless of the evident health risks and slogan related to smoking; “Smoking Kills.”

Art depicting smoking is clear across the entire world and over decades. Many functions depicting amounts and Lords of electricity smoking cigars in addition to cigarettes. With figures of significance known for smoking such as David Bowie, Frank Sinatra, Einstein, Churchill, Alan Rickman, and Ian Fleming all of whom died of smoke associated ailments.

This prevalence of smoking becoming a status symbol as a result of the cost of tobacco, cigars, and snus for people in UK, and so viewed as a luxury thing owned by just the wealthy as it was popularized. This notion of excellence through smoking is evident from the work of Pablo Picasso, Vincent Van Gogh in addition to contemporary artists such as Chuck Close. Their artworks depicting pictures of women smoking and men.

Boy with a Pipe, painted by Picasso in 1905 depicts a young boy dressed in blue carrying a pipe. The wall is painted at a red and A garland of roses encases his head, itself decorated by flowers. Picasso had used mild to mimic the boy’s head using all the sources flowing in from the top and supporting his hand that was. His emphasized face of this young boy falls to his garments compared. His overalls appearing worn and mudded. He gets no eye contact with the audience drawing on a barrier between the distance reflected in the audiences along with the painting. Slightly slumped, although, he seems casual at his pose and disengaged with his environment. This ordinary atmosphere indicates this acceptability and normality pf smoking and smoking at a young age. This bit was revolutionary for Picasso it revealed his kind of painting progressing from the forms towards a compatible classicism along with the El Greco palette, which means it is highly regarded and was seen by millions since.

Self-portrait with pipe and Straw hat, by Vincent Van Gogh, is adorned with big taches for brush strokes making a picture of split color. This manner of painting permitting to keep his experiments, putting tone next instead of expressing his paintings in color. The marks create this painting seem sketchy in look, but a greater focus on detail is recorded as one of the subjects of color, in the tonality of their face. Even though there is this painting a self-portrait currently catching the feeling of affinity between the farmers. The present staged or of Vincent posed. This provides a feeling of affinity with smoking, even as though it is a part of the habit. This connection isn’t giving status as what’s ordinary, but approval as well as it is taken in by action to part.

Enrique Simonet’s self-portrait painted in 1918 depicts himself, formally dressed and unlike the preceding two that he looks quite staged but not very attaining dominance or authority within his pose, with his hands resting in his pocket appearing rather at ease in his environment. This painting has been modeled to make naturalistic attributes to Simonet’s skin. Even though the painting onto the match seems to have been painted by dragging abrasive paint throughout the canvas making the painting’s unfinished look. Enrique makes eye contact with the audience, from underneath appearing as though he’s looking back on the viewer painted although no in a presence of jurisdiction. This provides a feeling of standing the way he views himself and to Enrique and his place in society. His present and match tobacco that is nonessential the fabric. Within this post period of 1918 at a recovering economy is reveals him as a man of power and wealth. His attitude towards his riches shows grandeur and excellence to all for example his cigarette. He is wealthy and can be portrayed smoking, his station in society increases the glamour about that act of smoking.

ALSO READ: How To Make A Rustic Wood Sign

More contemporary artists also have created self-portraits of these smoking such as Chuck Close. His huge Self-Portrait (with Cigarette) painted in 1967 — 1968 is a photorealistic portrait painted into a high quality of detail written with unique degrees of attention gap, described in the characteristic of the stubble but apparently less concentrated across the facial skin. He wanted this to be perceived as a large picture of himself, so that it is really hard to dismiss, which makes it big. This 9ft painting looks for himself. Its size permitting to interact with the picture allowing the viewer to see it. Appearing virtually indistinguishable the brush strokes clear on the surface. This painting captures much different light above shadows down on the face producing highlights from around the face with the picture lit and also to an extent. This mild producing shadows adding to the image’s level. The depiction of smoking in this painting could be summed up by Chuck Close himself who stated in a meeting; “There is no question, I’d some attitude about how I wished to be sensed. It sounds really funny trying to seem like this rough man with a cigarette sticking out from the corner of the mouth”. His portrait expresses an awareness of potency and masculinity attached to smoking though smoking is an indication of a man.

These paintings show evidence of this glamorization of smoking expressed through artwork as time passes. The depiction of smoking has gone to be portrayed in fields of the arts such as movies and music during its endorsement on account of the dismissal of this stigmatization of smoking. Although bans are set up to decrease the use of tobacco firms found a new frontier to advertise their brands; via music and films.

A US study revealed that onscreen smoking accounts for 37 percent of new adolescent smokers also predicted that at 2014 6 million new kid smokers could appear and two million could die from tobacco-induced diseases. For kids having tobacco at 70 ranked Together with the 15 most prosperous movies in the united kingdom from 1989-2008 under 18. Depicting smoking at the kind of Absolem a cigar robot and that the caterpillar. These pictures targeted at impressionable and young kids give an image of smoking as something that is okay to take in and as an occurrence.

Moreover, positioning of tobacco in songs movies has been rising over recent years to an extent which in 2014 from the 32 music movies there were 470 moments (4.7 mins) of cigarette impressions, which can be considered to have had more than 1 billion cigarette impressions produced in Britain alone. With latest music movies including 7 Years (Lukas Graham); “By eleven smoking pill and drinking burning spirits” and Castle on a Hill (Ed Sheeran) “Fifteen years of age and smoking hand-rolled smokes”, which makes apparent references to smoking at a young age with 7 years getting 630 million viewpoints around youtube and Castle on a mountain 270 million. (Pictures displaying scenes from Castle to a mountain music movie).

The health dangers this advertising of smoking can cause are awful. Nicotine is an extremely addictive substance and the approval of smoking given via artwork, music videos and movies is currently adding to the range of individuals. Smoking contributes to lung diseases such as COPD such as bronchitis and emphysema, lung cancer. Smokers in 13 X more likely to develop COPD and smokers who suffer from asthma. Smoking reduces fertility in both women and men and may have serious consequences on ladies. At deformities, there’s a heightened likelihood of a miscarriage, stillbirth and early births, and in smokers. It may have impacts to the blood and heart flow increasing the dangers of heart attacks, cardiovascular disease, and strokes. Together with inactive hand smokers also from inhaling the smoke in creating glue ear in children and the likelihood of chest infections and lung cancer. These dangers create the glamorization evident from the arts crucial and much more threatening.

Tobacco businesses justify themselves by saying that they are only meeting the market need and by doing this are supplying countless tasks to farmers of tobacco and inside their own companies. What their customers do with their products is them down and the dangers are clearly exhibited to them throughout the’smoking kills’ and’smokers die younger’ decals that are exhibited on the boxes, demonstrating they don’t condone the smoking and inhalation of the cigarettes that they create but they’re not likely to stop production as a result of large market demand. But this increases the morality of the creation. That if they’re so clear on the dangers their clients are in, how do they allow cigarettes to be generated when smoking’s consequences are so dire?

Smoking hasn’t only been popularised throughout the arts but also by the rich and famous. Stars are being these folks with effects on youthful websites and being used as role models, smoking. Additionally, smoking had invited another 50 percent of their populace to be invited to smoking.

Though some might argue otherwise. People have free will and freedom of choice what actions they participate in and in what they do. That their merchandise can be marketed by a new in any way what the client does with the item although that they desire is their own pick. The depiction of smoking people view is not glamorizing smoking but only revealing that smoking is an accepted part of the culture and there is plenty of movies, music, and art that condemn smoking for what it really is. That for a few smoking gives an essential escape from anxiety and calms nerves offering many with a relief.

In the finish the art of Picasso and Van Gogh portray smoking in this relaxed and casual fashion as merely part of society it looks normal and anticipated, meanwhile at the art of Enrique Simone that there is a higher connotation of social standing, class, and prosperity behind the easy act of smoking. This provides a new dimension to smoking putting a greater significance and. No matter how Chuck Close’s artwork provides reason to think it indicates a feeling of durability and masculinity. This depiction of smoking also has discovered its natural path to different forms of the arts that in this day and age have higher consequences on younger generations which regardless of the health dangers and warnings that the amounts of smokers have improved and the creation of cigarettes hasn’t halted. I believe this glamorization of smoking in art’s effect is as a knock-on the impact that the numbers of smokers have significantly improved and what’s resulted in its widespread acceptance and advancement. That the glamour’s consequences are concealed beneath the haze of approval created from audio and actors celebrating smoking and boosting its places of life.